Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BEAUFORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BEAUFORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 420067 | SC | 167 beds | Current EBITDA $-19.6M → Pro Forma $-5.5M (+$14.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$269.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-19.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$14.1M
Modeled Uplift
$9.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.6M (vs $14.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$172K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$148K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$825K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$172K$172K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.5M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-19.6M$-19.6M-7.3%
Year 1$-20.2M+$9.4M$-10.8M-4.0%
Year 2$-20.8M+$14.1M$-6.6M-2.5%
Year 3$-21.4M+$14.1M$-7.3M-2.7%
Year 4$-22.1M+$14.1M$-7.9M-2.9%
Year 5$-22.7M+$14.1M$-8.6M-3.2%
$-196.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-94.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$101.7M
Value Created
$-8.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-31.2M
Organic Growth
$141.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$129K$172K$207K
Total$7.1M$10.6M$14.1M$17.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.3%-10.8%-0.0%8.3%
P26
Net-to-Gross27.4%18.5%25.5%28.0%
P63
Occupancy54.1%48.8%58.2%68.5%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.6M$633K$1.1M$1.5M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.7M$635K$1.1M$1.4M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML