Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PH GREER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PH GREER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 420033 | SC | 66 beds | Current EBITDA $50.5M → Pro Forma $58.9M (+$8.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$161.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$50.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$58.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$8.5M
Modeled Uplift
$6.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.6M (vs $8.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$103K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.2M$3.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.1M$89K$3.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$495K$1.5M$2.0M$6.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$103K$103K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$806K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$798K$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$654K$1.3M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$52K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Cumulative$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x26% / 3.2x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$50.5M$50.5M31.3%
Year 1$52.0M+$5.7M$57.6M35.7%
Year 2$53.5M+$8.5M$62.0M38.5%
Year 3$55.1M+$8.5M$63.6M39.5%
Year 4$56.8M+$8.5M$65.3M40.5%
Year 5$58.5M+$8.5M$67.0M41.5%
$504.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$736.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$232.2M
Value Created
$67.0M
Exit EBITDA
$80.4M
Organic Growth
$84.8M
RCM Value Creation
$67.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$981K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$52K$77K$103K$124K
Total$4.2M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 47 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin31.3%-6.7%5.1%17.4%
P91
Net-to-Gross26.4%20.3%27.1%52.7%
P43
Occupancy92.5%48.0%66.6%75.9%
P94
Rev/Bed$2.4M$439K$732K$1.6M
P85
Exp/Bed$1.7M$376K$657K$1.4M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML