Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRISMA HEALTH RICHLAND HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRISMA HEALTH RICHLAND HOSPITAL
CCN 420018 | SC | 600 beds | Current EBITDA $4.0M → Pro Forma $52.1M (+$48.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$913.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$48.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$52.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$35.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$48.0M
Modeled Uplift
$32.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$15.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $32.9M (vs $48.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$18.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$18.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$585K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$48.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$18.3M$18.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.6M$502K$18.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.8M$8.3M$11.1M$35.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$585K$585K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.6M$9.1M$13.7M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M$18.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.5M$9.0M$13.6M$18.1M$18.1M$18.1M$18.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.7M$7.4M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$292K$585K$585K$585K$585K$585K$585K
Cumulative$0$13.1M$26.2M$39.0M$48.0M$48.0M$48.0M$48.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $48.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x147% / 92.7x153% / 103.3x158% / 114.0x160% / 119.3x163% / 124.7x
9.0x141% / 82.0x147% / 91.5x152% / 101.0x154% / 105.7x156% / 110.4x
10.0x136% / 73.5x141% / 82.0x146% / 90.5x149% / 94.8x151% / 99.1x
11.0x132% / 66.5x137% / 74.3x141% / 82.0x144% / 85.9x146% / 89.8x
12.0x127% / 60.7x132% / 67.8x137% / 74.9x139% / 78.5x141% / 82.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.8x
Headroom (turns)
90%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 90% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.7x, adding 7.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.0M$4.0M0.4%
Year 1$4.1M+$32.0M$36.2M4.0%
Year 2$4.3M+$48.0M$52.3M5.7%
Year 3$4.4M+$48.0M$52.4M5.7%
Year 4$4.5M+$48.0M$52.6M5.8%
Year 5$4.7M+$48.0M$52.7M5.8%
$40.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$579.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$539.6M
Value Created
$52.7M
Exit EBITDA
$6.4M
Organic Growth
$480.5M
RCM Value Creation
$52.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.1M$13.7M$18.3M$21.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.0M$13.6M$18.1M$21.7M
A/R Days Reduction$5.6M$8.3M$11.1M$13.3M
Clean Claim Rate$292K$438K$585K$701K
Total$24.0M$36.0M$48.0M$57.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 13 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.4%-2.3%1.1%8.3%
P38
Net-to-Gross25.9%17.6%21.7%27.8%
P54
Occupancy77.7%76.0%77.7%82.5%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.5M$1.6M$2.1M
P31
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.6M$1.8M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML