Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTRO DE SALUD CONDUCTUAL MENONITA 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTRO DE SALUD CONDUCTUAL MENONITA
CCN 404009 | PR | 61 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.7M → Pro Forma $-5.3M (+$472K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$472K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$339K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$472K
Modeled Uplift
$337K
Risk-Adjusted
-$135K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$178K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$177K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$107K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$472K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$170K$8K$178K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$177K$177K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$27K$80K$107K$339K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$45K$89K$134K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Cost to Collect$0$44K$88K$132K$177K$177K$177K$177K
A/R Days Reduction$0$36K$72K$107K$107K$107K$107K$107K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$129K$259K$383K$472K$472K$472K$472K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $472K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.7M$-5.7M-64.9%
Year 1$-5.9M+$315K$-5.6M-63.3%
Year 2$-6.1M+$472K$-5.6M-63.5%
Year 3$-6.3M+$472K$-5.8M-65.6%
Year 4$-6.5M+$472K$-6.0M-67.7%
Year 5$-6.6M+$472K$-6.2M-69.9%
$-57.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-67.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-10.6M
Value Created
$-6.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.1M
Organic Growth
$4.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$89K$134K$178K$214K
Cost to Collect$88K$132K$177K$212K
A/R Days Reduction$54K$81K$107K$129K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$236K$354K$472K$566K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-43.3%-10.7%-1.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross42.4%53.1%58.4%63.4%
P14
Occupancy79.3%41.2%60.4%79.1%
P73
Rev/Bed$145K$205K$376K$415K
P5
Exp/Bed$239K$260K$386K$488K
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML