Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MULTY MEDICAL FACILITIES 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MULTY MEDICAL FACILITIES
CCN 403027 | PR | 57 beds | Current EBITDA $-117K → Pro Forma $357K (+$474K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-117K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$474K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$357K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$340K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$474K
Modeled Uplift
$313K
Risk-Adjusted
-$161K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$179K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$177K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$108K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$474K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$171K$8K$179K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$177K$177K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$27K$81K$108K$340K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$45K$90K$134K$179K$179K$179K$179K
Cost to Collect$0$44K$89K$133K$177K$177K$177K$177K
A/R Days Reduction$0$36K$72K$108K$108K$108K$108K$108K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$130K$260K$385K$474K$474K$474K$474K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $474K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.3x
Headroom (turns)
143%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 143% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.8x, adding 101.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-117K$-117K-1.3%
Year 1$-120K+$316K$196K2.2%
Year 2$-124K+$474K$350K3.9%
Year 3$-128K+$474K$347K3.9%
Year 4$-131K+$474K$343K3.9%
Year 5$-135K+$474K$339K3.8%
$-1.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.9M
Value Created
$339K
Exit EBITDA
$-186K
Organic Growth
$4.7M
RCM Value Creation
$339K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$90K$134K$179K$215K
Cost to Collect$89K$133K$177K$213K
A/R Days Reduction$54K$81K$108K$130K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$237K$356K$474K$569K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.3%-50.0%-17.0%-1.0%
P68
Net-to-Gross79.5%52.7%57.8%68.2%
P84
Occupancy59.7%39.5%59.7%83.1%
P47
Rev/Bed$156K$191K$363K$420K
P16
Exp/Bed$158K$247K$355K$495K
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML