Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARIBBEAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARIBBEAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 400131 | PR | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $-147K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-147K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$953K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$305K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$497K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$492K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$302K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$497K$497K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$478K$14K$492K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$76K$226K$302K$953K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$124K$248K$373K$497K$497K$497K$497K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$123K$246K$369K$492K$492K$492K$492K
A/R Days Reduction$0$101K$201K$302K$302K$302K$302K$302K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$356K$712K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.6x
Headroom (turns)
117%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 117% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.1x, adding 100.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-147K$-147K-0.6%
Year 1$-151K+$871K$720K2.9%
Year 2$-156K+$1.3M$1.2M4.6%
Year 3$-161K+$1.3M$1.1M4.6%
Year 4$-166K+$1.3M$1.1M4.6%
Year 5$-170K+$1.3M$1.1M4.6%
$-1.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$12.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.0M
Value Created
$1.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-234K
Organic Growth
$13.1M
RCM Value Creation
$1.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$248K$373K$497K$596K
Denial Rate Reductio$246K$369K$492K$590K
A/R Days Reduction$151K$227K$302K$363K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$653K$980K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 15 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.6%-50.0%-17.0%-1.0%
P73
Net-to-Gross57.8%52.7%57.8%68.2%
P47
Occupancy95.3%42.6%61.1%87.6%
P80
Rev/Bed$564K$199K$380K$439K
P80
Exp/Bed$568K$242K$425K$534K
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML