Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METRO MAYAGUEZ 2026-04-26 08:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METRO MAYAGUEZ
CCN 400123 | PR | 122 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.5M → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$831K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$615K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$973K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$155K$460K$615K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$253K$505K$758K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$250K$500K$750K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$205K$410K$615K$615K$615K$615K$615K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$724K$1.4M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-10.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
16.9x
Headroom (turns)
260%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 260% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -10.4x, adding 109.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.5M$-1.5M-2.9%
Year 1$-1.5M+$1.8M$264K0.5%
Year 2$-1.6M+$2.7M$1.1M2.2%
Year 3$-1.6M+$2.7M$1.1M2.1%
Year 4$-1.6M+$2.7M$1.0M2.0%
Year 5$-1.7M+$2.7M$961K1.9%
$-14.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.2M
Value Created
$961K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.3M
Organic Growth
$26.6M
RCM Value Creation
$961K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$505K$758K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$500K$750K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$307K$461K$615K$738K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 41 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.9%-20.7%-9.4%0.6%
P71
Net-to-Gross60.7%55.0%61.1%75.7%
P46
Occupancy70.0%44.7%65.0%74.6%
P56
Rev/Bed$414K$244K$364K$466K
P63
Exp/Bed$426K$294K$405K$490K
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML