Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MAYAGUEZ MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MAYAGUEZ MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 400103 | PR | 210 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $13.2M (+$5.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$102.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$5.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.8M (vs $5.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$57K$2.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$315K$935K$1.3M$3.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$514K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$509K$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$417K$834K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.8x
9.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M7.6%
Year 1$8.0M+$3.6M$11.6M11.3%
Year 2$8.2M+$5.4M$13.6M13.3%
Year 3$8.5M+$5.4M$13.9M13.5%
Year 4$8.7M+$5.4M$14.1M13.8%
Year 5$9.0M+$5.4M$14.4M14.0%
$77.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$158.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$80.8M
Value Created
$14.4M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$54.1M
RCM Value Creation
$14.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$625K$938K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$49K$66K$79K
Total$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.6%-20.7%-5.7%1.2%
P86
Net-to-Gross55.0%55.0%60.7%75.7%
P24
Occupancy75.4%45.4%69.3%74.6%
P78
Rev/Bed$489K$244K$364K$466K
P78
Exp/Bed$452K$294K$394K$476K
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML