Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY DISCTRICT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY DISCTRICT HOSPITAL
CCN 400061 | PR | 210 beds | Current EBITDA $-42.1M → Pro Forma $-37.0M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$97.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-42.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-37.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.5M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$62K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$54K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$299K$886K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$62K$62K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$487K$974K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$482K$964K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$395K$790K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-42.1M$-42.1M-43.2%
Year 1$-43.4M+$3.4M$-40.0M-41.0%
Year 2$-44.7M+$5.1M$-39.5M-40.6%
Year 3$-46.0M+$5.1M$-40.9M-42.0%
Year 4$-47.4M+$5.1M$-42.3M-43.4%
Year 5$-48.8M+$5.1M$-43.7M-44.9%
$-421.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-480.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-59.5M
Value Created
$-43.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-67.1M
Organic Growth
$51.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-43.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$974K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$964K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$592K$889K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$62K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-43.2%-20.7%-5.7%1.2%
P11
Net-to-Gross100.0%55.0%60.7%75.7%
P92
Occupancy76.7%45.4%69.3%74.6%
P84
Rev/Bed$464K$244K$364K$466K
P70
Exp/Bed$664K$294K$394K$476K
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML