Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SAN LUCAS PONCE 2026-04-26 05:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SAN LUCAS PONCE
CCN 400044 | PR | 348 beds | Current EBITDA $13.0M → Pro Forma $20.4M (+$7.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$141.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$7.4M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$90K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.8M$2.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.7M$78K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$433K$1.3M$1.7M$5.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$90K$90K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$705K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$698K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$572K$1.1M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$45K$90K$90K$90K$90K$90K$90K
Cumulative$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
9.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.0M$13.0M9.2%
Year 1$13.4M+$4.9M$18.3M13.0%
Year 2$13.8M+$7.4M$21.2M15.0%
Year 3$14.2M+$7.4M$21.6M15.3%
Year 4$14.6M+$7.4M$22.0M15.6%
Year 5$15.0M+$7.4M$22.5M15.9%
$129.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$247.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$117.3M
Value Created
$22.5M
Exit EBITDA
$20.7M
Organic Growth
$74.2M
RCM Value Creation
$22.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$858K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$45K$68K$90K$108K
Total$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.2%-17.3%-0.2%6.4%
P86
Net-to-Gross69.0%52.0%56.0%68.4%
P71
Occupancy61.8%62.3%72.0%75.5%
P21
Rev/Bed$405K$274K$403K$488K
P50
Exp/Bed$368K$311K$393K$483K
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML