Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYAMON MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYAMON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 400032 | PR | 207 beds | Current EBITDA $527K → Pro Forma $4.8M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$81.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$527K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.9M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$994K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$52K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$251K$743K$994K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$52K$52K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT75.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$408K$817K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$404K$808K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$331K$662K$994K$994K$994K$994K$994K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x130% / 64.9x136% / 72.5x140% / 80.0x142% / 83.8x145% / 87.6x
9.0x125% / 57.3x130% / 64.0x134% / 70.8x137% / 74.1x139% / 77.5x
10.0x120% / 51.2x125% / 57.3x129% / 63.4x131% / 66.4x134% / 69.4x
11.0x115% / 46.3x120% / 51.8x125% / 57.3x127% / 60.1x129% / 62.8x
12.0x111% / 42.2x116% / 47.2x121% / 52.3x123% / 54.8x125% / 57.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.6x
Headroom (turns)
86%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 86% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.9x, adding 7.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$527K$527K0.6%
Year 1$542K+$2.9M$3.4M4.2%
Year 2$559K+$4.3M$4.9M5.9%
Year 3$575K+$4.3M$4.9M6.0%
Year 4$593K+$4.3M$4.9M6.0%
Year 5$610K+$4.3M$4.9M6.0%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$54.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.7M
Value Created
$4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$839K
Organic Growth
$43.0M
RCM Value Creation
$4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$817K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$808K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$497K$745K$994K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$52K$63K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 37 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.6%-20.7%-5.7%1.2%
P70
Net-to-Gross66.6%55.0%60.7%75.7%
P68
Occupancy71.6%45.4%69.3%74.6%
P62
Rev/Bed$394K$244K$364K$466K
P57
Exp/Bed$392K$294K$394K$476K
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML