Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MALVERN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 17:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MALVERN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 394057 | PA | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $-624K → Pro Forma $-223K (+$401K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-624K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$401K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-223K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+538bps
Margin Improvement
$286K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$401K
Modeled Uplift
$264K
Risk-Adjusted
-$137K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$152K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$149K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$91K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$401K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$143K$8K$152K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$149K$149K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$23K$68K$91K$286K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$38K$76K$114K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Cost to Collect$0$37K$75K$112K$149K$149K$149K$149K
A/R Days Reduction$0$30K$60K$91K$91K$91K$91K$91K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$110K$220K$326K$401K$401K$401K$401K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $401K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-624K$-624K-8.4%
Year 1$-643K+$267K$-376K-5.0%
Year 2$-662K+$401K$-261K-3.5%
Year 3$-682K+$401K$-281K-3.8%
Year 4$-703K+$401K$-302K-4.0%
Year 5$-724K+$401K$-323K-4.3%
$-6.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.7M
Value Created
$-323K
Exit EBITDA
$-994K
Organic Growth
$4.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-323K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$76K$114K$152K$182K
Cost to Collect$75K$112K$149K$179K
A/R Days Reduction$45K$68K$91K$109K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$200K$301K$401K$481K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 81 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.4%-17.9%0.4%8.9%
P40
Net-to-Gross42.8%18.0%29.8%38.1%
P76
Occupancy53.2%33.7%55.2%73.8%
P48
Rev/Bed$138K$400K$574K$1.3M
P4
Exp/Bed$150K$387K$695K$1.3M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML