Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TOWER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 15:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TOWER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 394056 | PA | 144 beds | Current EBITDA $8.5M → Pro Forma $11.0M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$732K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$966K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$957K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$588K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$966K$966K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$930K$27K$957K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$148K$440K$588K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$242K$483K$725K$966K$966K$966K$966K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$239K$478K$718K$957K$957K$957K$957K
A/R Days Reduction$0$196K$392K$588K$588K$588K$588K$588K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$692K$1.4M$2.1M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.5M$8.5M17.5%
Year 1$8.7M+$1.7M$10.4M21.6%
Year 2$9.0M+$2.5M$11.5M23.9%
Year 3$9.3M+$2.5M$11.8M24.4%
Year 4$9.5M+$2.5M$12.1M25.0%
Year 5$9.8M+$2.5M$12.4M25.6%
$84.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$136.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.3M
Value Created
$12.4M
Exit EBITDA
$13.5M
Organic Growth
$25.4M
RCM Value Creation
$12.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$483K$725K$966K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$478K$718K$957K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$294K$441K$588K$706K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 103 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.5%-19.0%-7.5%5.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross35.3%18.2%25.5%33.5%
P81
Occupancy79.7%45.0%59.9%75.0%
P82
Rev/Bed$336K$519K$1.0M$1.5M
P15
Exp/Bed$277K$547K$1.1M$1.6M
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML