Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH HOSPITAL
CCN 394055 | PA | 126 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $6.9M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$586K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$855K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$846K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$520K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$855K$855K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$823K$23K$846K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$131K$389K$520K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$214K$427K$641K$855K$855K$855K$855K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$212K$423K$635K$846K$846K$846K$846K
A/R Days Reduction$0$173K$347K$520K$520K$520K$520K$520K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$612K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M10.9%
Year 1$4.8M+$1.5M$6.3M14.7%
Year 2$4.9M+$2.2M$7.2M16.8%
Year 3$5.1M+$2.2M$7.3M17.2%
Year 4$5.2M+$2.2M$7.5M17.5%
Year 5$5.4M+$2.2M$7.6M17.9%
$46.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$84.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.5M
Value Created
$7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$7.4M
Organic Growth
$22.5M
RCM Value Creation
$7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$427K$641K$855K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$423K$635K$846K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$260K$390K$520K$624K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$27K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 107 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.9%-18.4%-7.5%5.2%
P83
Net-to-Gross30.8%18.3%25.6%34.9%
P66
Occupancy91.5%44.0%59.3%75.1%
P93
Rev/Bed$339K$494K$983K$1.4M
P17
Exp/Bed$302K$467K$1.1M$1.6M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML