Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL HOSP- PHILADELPHIA 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAVEN BEHAVIORAL HOSP- PHILADELPHIA
CCN 394053 | PA | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$678K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$678K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$493K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$678K
Modeled Uplift
$507K
Risk-Adjusted
-$171K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$257K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$256K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$156K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$678K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$257K$257K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$247K$8K$256K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$117K$156K$493K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$64K$128K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$128K$192K$256K$256K$256K$256K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$104K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$185K$370K$550K$678K$678K$678K$678K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $678K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
9.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x
10.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.7x
11.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x56% / 9.4x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M8.5%
Year 1$1.1M+$452K$1.6M12.3%
Year 2$1.2M+$678K$1.8M14.3%
Year 3$1.2M+$678K$1.9M14.6%
Year 4$1.2M+$678K$1.9M14.8%
Year 5$1.3M+$678K$1.9M15.1%
$10.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.5M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.7M
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$128K$193K$257K$308K
Denial Rate Reductio$128K$192K$256K$307K
A/R Days Reduction$78K$117K$156K$188K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$339K$509K$678K$814K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 77 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.5%-12.8%1.8%9.1%
P71
Net-to-Gross44.0%20.5%31.7%44.4%
P74
Occupancy94.1%28.6%50.5%71.7%
P99
Rev/Bed$306K$407K$777K$1.7M
P13
Exp/Bed$280K$387K$871K$1.5M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML