Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLARION PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLARION PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL
CCN 394043 | PA | 112 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $7.7M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$453K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$556K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$550K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$338K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$556K$556K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$535K$15K$550K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$85K$253K$338K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$139K$278K$417K$556K$556K$556K$556K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$138K$275K$413K$550K$550K$550K$550K
A/R Days Reduction$0$113K$225K$338K$338K$338K$338K$338K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$398K$796K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M22.5%
Year 1$6.4M+$975K$7.4M26.7%
Year 2$6.6M+$1.5M$8.1M29.2%
Year 3$6.8M+$1.5M$8.3M29.9%
Year 4$7.0M+$1.5M$8.5M30.6%
Year 5$7.3M+$1.5M$8.7M31.4%
$62.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$95.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.3M
Value Created
$8.7M
Exit EBITDA
$10.0M
Organic Growth
$14.6M
RCM Value Creation
$8.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$278K$417K$556K$667K
Denial Rate Reductio$275K$413K$550K$660K
A/R Days Reduction$169K$254K$338K$406K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$731K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.5%-19.0%-6.2%7.5%
P98
Net-to-Gross47.0%17.5%26.3%35.1%
P88
Occupancy70.5%39.6%59.0%76.2%
P69
Rev/Bed$248K$477K$801K$1.3M
P9
Exp/Bed$192K$441K$942K$1.4M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML