Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LANCASTER REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LANCASTER REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 393054 | PA | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $5.6M → Pro Forma $7.1M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$416K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$562K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$557K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$342K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$562K$562K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$541K$15K$557K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$86K$256K$342K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$141K$281K$422K$562K$562K$562K$562K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$139K$278K$418K$557K$557K$557K$557K
A/R Days Reduction$0$114K$228K$342K$342K$342K$342K$342K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$403K$806K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.6M$5.6M19.9%
Year 1$5.8M+$986K$6.8M24.1%
Year 2$5.9M+$1.5M$7.4M26.4%
Year 3$6.1M+$1.5M$7.6M27.1%
Year 4$6.3M+$1.5M$7.8M27.7%
Year 5$6.5M+$1.5M$8.0M28.4%
$56.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$87.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.7M
Value Created
$8.0M
Exit EBITDA
$8.9M
Organic Growth
$14.8M
RCM Value Creation
$8.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$281K$422K$562K$675K
Denial Rate Reductio$278K$418K$557K$668K
A/R Days Reduction$171K$257K$342K$411K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$22K
Total$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.9%-18.2%-0.1%8.9%
P94
Net-to-Gross62.7%18.5%29.8%38.1%
P92
Occupancy77.6%33.7%56.4%73.8%
P80
Rev/Bed$477K$374K$558K$1.2M
P36
Exp/Bed$381K$387K$648K$1.3M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML