Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 393045 | PA | 67 beds | Current EBITDA $6.8M → Pro Forma $8.5M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$454K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$654K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$648K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$398K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$654K$654K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$630K$18K$648K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$100K$298K$398K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$164K$327K$491K$654K$654K$654K$654K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$162K$324K$486K$648K$648K$648K$648K
A/R Days Reduction$0$133K$265K$398K$398K$398K$398K$398K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$469K$937K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.8M$6.8M20.8%
Year 1$7.0M+$1.1M$8.2M24.9%
Year 2$7.2M+$1.7M$8.9M27.3%
Year 3$7.4M+$1.7M$9.2M28.0%
Year 4$7.7M+$1.7M$9.4M28.7%
Year 5$7.9M+$1.7M$9.6M29.4%
$68.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$105.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.7M
Value Created
$9.6M
Exit EBITDA
$10.8M
Organic Growth
$17.2M
RCM Value Creation
$9.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$327K$491K$654K$785K
Denial Rate Reductio$324K$486K$648K$777K
A/R Days Reduction$199K$299K$398K$478K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$861K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.8%-18.3%-0.4%8.9%
P96
Net-to-Gross65.2%18.6%30.3%38.3%
P95
Occupancy86.7%35.3%56.2%71.9%
P92
Rev/Bed$488K$406K$619K$1.2M
P35
Exp/Bed$387K$395K$827K$1.3M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML