Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 393031 | PA | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $5.5M → Pro Forma $7.4M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$531K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$716K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$709K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$436K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$716K$716K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$689K$20K$709K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$110K$326K$436K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$179K$358K$537K$716K$716K$716K$716K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$177K$354K$532K$709K$709K$709K$709K
A/R Days Reduction$0$145K$290K$436K$436K$436K$436K$436K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$513K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.5M$5.5M15.4%
Year 1$5.7M+$1.3M$6.9M19.4%
Year 2$5.8M+$1.9M$7.7M21.6%
Year 3$6.0M+$1.9M$7.9M22.1%
Year 4$6.2M+$1.9M$8.1M22.6%
Year 5$6.4M+$1.9M$8.3M23.1%
$55.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$91.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.9M
Value Created
$8.3M
Exit EBITDA
$8.8M
Organic Growth
$18.8M
RCM Value Creation
$8.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$358K$537K$716K$859K
Denial Rate Reductio$354K$532K$709K$851K
A/R Days Reduction$218K$327K$436K$523K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$942K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 103 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.4%-18.0%-2.1%8.5%
P88
Net-to-Gross75.3%18.6%28.5%37.8%
P96
Occupancy75.4%35.9%56.6%73.1%
P77
Rev/Bed$477K$415K$688K$1.2M
P30
Exp/Bed$404K$422K$823K$1.3M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML