Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 393027 | PA | 162 beds | Current EBITDA $-891K → Pro Forma $264K (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-891K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$264K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$842K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$679K
Risk-Adjusted
-$476K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$439K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$435K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$267K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$439K$439K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$423K$12K$435K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$67K$200K$267K$842K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$110K$219K$329K$439K$439K$439K$439K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$109K$217K$326K$435K$435K$435K$435K
A/R Days Reduction$0$89K$178K$267K$267K$267K$267K$267K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$314K$629K$936K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-28.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
35.0x
Headroom (turns)
539%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 539% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -28.5x, adding 127.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-891K$-891K-4.1%
Year 1$-917K+$770K$-147K-0.7%
Year 2$-945K+$1.2M$210K1.0%
Year 3$-973K+$1.2M$182K0.8%
Year 4$-1.0M+$1.2M$152K0.7%
Year 5$-1.0M+$1.2M$122K0.6%
$-8.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.3M
Value Created
$122K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$11.5M
RCM Value Creation
$122K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$219K$329K$439K$527K
Denial Rate Reductio$217K$326K$435K$521K
A/R Days Reduction$134K$200K$267K$320K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$577K$866K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.1%-18.5%-7.5%3.0%
P55
Net-to-Gross69.1%16.8%23.8%32.2%
P99
Occupancy23.2%45.6%59.0%74.5%
P4
Rev/Bed$135K$560K$1.1M$1.5M
P0
Exp/Bed$141K$596K$1.2M$1.6M
P1

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML