Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 09:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 393026 | PA | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $2.8M → Pro Forma $4.1M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$956K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$908K
Risk-Adjusted
-$403K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$498K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$493K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$303K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$498K$498K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$480K$14K$493K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$76K$227K$303K$956K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$125K$249K$374K$498K$498K$498K$498K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$123K$247K$370K$493K$493K$493K$493K
A/R Days Reduction$0$101K$202K$303K$303K$303K$303K$303K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$357K$714K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
9.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
10.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.8M$2.8M11.1%
Year 1$2.8M+$874K$3.7M14.9%
Year 2$2.9M+$1.3M$4.2M17.0%
Year 3$3.0M+$1.3M$4.3M17.4%
Year 4$3.1M+$1.3M$4.4M17.7%
Year 5$3.2M+$1.3M$4.5M18.1%
$27.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$49.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$22.0M
Value Created
$4.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.4M
Organic Growth
$13.1M
RCM Value Creation
$4.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$249K$374K$498K$598K
Denial Rate Reductio$247K$370K$493K$592K
A/R Days Reduction$152K$227K$303K$364K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$656K$983K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.1%-18.0%0.4%9.0%
P78
Net-to-Gross79.7%18.6%29.8%38.4%
P98
Occupancy62.3%33.9%56.4%73.1%
P64
Rev/Bed$415K$365K$558K$1.3M
P32
Exp/Bed$369K$384K$648K$1.3M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML