Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - CENTRAL PA 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - CENTRAL PA
CCN 392039 | PA | 92 beds | Current EBITDA $6.4M → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$736K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$619K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$979K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$156K$463K$619K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$254K$508K$763K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$252K$503K$755K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$206K$412K$619K$619K$619K$619K$619K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$728K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.4M$6.4M12.6%
Year 1$6.6M+$1.8M$8.4M16.5%
Year 2$6.8M+$2.7M$9.5M18.6%
Year 3$7.0M+$2.7M$9.7M19.0%
Year 4$7.2M+$2.7M$9.9M19.5%
Year 5$7.4M+$2.7M$10.1M19.9%
$64.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$111.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.1M
Value Created
$10.1M
Exit EBITDA
$10.2M
Organic Growth
$26.7M
RCM Value Creation
$10.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$508K$763K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$503K$755K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$309K$464K$619K$742K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$33K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 102 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.6%-19.8%-5.0%8.2%
P83
Net-to-Gross15.5%18.8%28.2%37.6%
P13
Occupancy76.5%38.5%58.5%76.2%
P75
Rev/Bed$553K$416K$619K$1.3M
P42
Exp/Bed$483K$408K$783K$1.3M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML