Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MINERS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MINERS HOSPITAL
CCN 391317 | PA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $732K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$732K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$807K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$666K
Risk-Adjusted
-$441K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$421K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$417K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$256K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$421K$421K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$405K$12K$417K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$65K$191K$256K$807K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$105K$210K$316K$421K$421K$421K$421K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$104K$208K$312K$417K$417K$417K$417K
A/R Days Reduction$0$85K$171K$256K$256K$256K$256K$256K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$301K$603K$897K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x
9.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.0x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
10.0x65% / 12.4x70% / 14.1x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x
11.0x61% / 11.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
12.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
48%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 48% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$732K$732K3.5%
Year 1$754K+$738K$1.5M7.1%
Year 2$777K+$1.1M$1.9M9.0%
Year 3$800K+$1.1M$1.9M9.1%
Year 4$824K+$1.1M$1.9M9.2%
Year 5$849K+$1.1M$2.0M9.3%
$7.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.2M
Value Created
$2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$11.1M
RCM Value Creation
$2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$210K$316K$421K$505K
Denial Rate Reductio$208K$312K$417K$500K
A/R Days Reduction$128K$192K$256K$307K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$13K$16K
Total$553K$830K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.5%-19.4%-1.5%5.7%
P69
Net-to-Gross29.7%24.6%31.2%41.6%
P44
Occupancy17.9%18.4%35.6%54.5%
P22
Rev/Bed$841K$419K$1.1M$2.1M
P39
Exp/Bed$812K$547K$1.2M$1.9M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML