Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROOKVILLE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 21:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROOKVILLE HOSPITAL
CCN 391312 | PA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-926K → Pro Forma $674K (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-926K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$674K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$577K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$608K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$602K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$370K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$608K$608K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$585K$17K$602K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$277K$370K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$152K$304K$456K$608K$608K$608K$608K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$151K$301K$452K$602K$602K$602K$602K
A/R Days Reduction$0$123K$247K$370K$370K$370K$370K$370K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$436K$871K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-11.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
18.1x
Headroom (turns)
279%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 279% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -11.6x, adding 110.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-926K$-926K-3.0%
Year 1$-954K+$1.1M$113K0.4%
Year 2$-982K+$1.6M$617K2.0%
Year 3$-1.0M+$1.6M$588K1.9%
Year 4$-1.0M+$1.6M$558K1.8%
Year 5$-1.1M+$1.6M$526K1.7%
$-9.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.0M
Value Created
$526K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.5M
Organic Growth
$16.0M
RCM Value Creation
$526K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$304K$456K$608K$730K
Denial Rate Reductio$301K$452K$602K$722K
A/R Days Reduction$185K$278K$370K$444K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$800K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.0%-19.4%-1.5%5.7%
P46
Net-to-Gross36.4%24.6%31.2%41.6%
P68
Occupancy33.7%18.4%35.6%54.5%
P46
Rev/Bed$1.2M$419K$1.1M$2.1M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.3M$547K$1.2M$1.9M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML