Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AHN HEMPFIELD NEIGHBORHOOD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AHN HEMPFIELD NEIGHBORHOOD HOSPITAL
CCN 390333 | PA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-162K → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-162K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$941K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$870K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$862K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$530K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$870K$870K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$838K$24K$862K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$134K$396K$530K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$218K$435K$653K$870K$870K$870K$870K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$215K$431K$646K$862K$862K$862K$862K
A/R Days Reduction$0$177K$353K$530K$530K$530K$530K$530K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$623K$1.2M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.1x
Headroom (turns)
110%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 110% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.6x, adding 99.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-162K$-162K-0.4%
Year 1$-167K+$1.5M$1.4M3.1%
Year 2$-172K+$2.3M$2.1M4.9%
Year 3$-177K+$2.3M$2.1M4.9%
Year 4$-183K+$2.3M$2.1M4.8%
Year 5$-188K+$2.3M$2.1M4.8%
$-1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$23.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.7M
Value Created
$2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-258K
Organic Growth
$22.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$435K$653K$870K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$431K$646K$862K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$265K$397K$530K$635K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.4%-12.5%1.7%9.0%
P44
Net-to-Gross17.7%21.7%31.7%44.0%
P16
Occupancy9.0%27.9%46.8%69.3%
P7
Rev/Bed$1.1M$414K$841K$1.8M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.1M$391K$963K$1.5M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML