Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES HOSPITAL - MONROE CAMPUS 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES HOSPITAL - MONROE CAMPUS
CCN 390330 | PA | 98 beds | Current EBITDA $17.3M → Pro Forma $29.0M (+$11.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$221.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$17.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$11.7M
Modeled Uplift
$8.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.9M (vs $11.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$142K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.4M$4.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.3M$122K$4.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$681K$2.0M$2.7M$8.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$142K$142K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$900K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$71K$142K$142K$142K$142K$142K$142K
Cumulative$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.5M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M$11.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$17.3M$17.3M7.8%
Year 1$17.8M+$7.8M$25.6M11.5%
Year 2$18.4M+$11.7M$30.0M13.5%
Year 3$18.9M+$11.7M$30.6M13.8%
Year 4$19.5M+$11.7M$31.1M14.0%
Year 5$20.1M+$11.7M$31.7M14.3%
$173.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$349.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$176.0M
Value Created
$31.7M
Exit EBITDA
$27.6M
Organic Growth
$116.7M
RCM Value Creation
$31.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$71K$106K$142K$170K
Total$5.8M$8.8M$11.7M$14.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 108 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.8%-21.1%-5.8%8.1%
P72
Net-to-Gross12.5%17.5%27.0%35.9%
P4
Occupancy83.5%39.5%58.5%76.7%
P86
Rev/Bed$2.3M$416K$704K$1.3M
P92
Exp/Bed$2.1M$415K$856K$1.4M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML