Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST LUKE HOSPITAL ANDERSON CAMPUS 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST LUKE HOSPITAL ANDERSON CAMPUS
CCN 390326 | PA | 193 beds | Current EBITDA $89.0M → Pro Forma $111.8M (+$22.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$433.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$89.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$111.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$22.8M
Modeled Uplift
$16.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.9M (vs $22.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$277K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.7M$8.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.3M$238K$8.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.9M$5.3M$16.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$277K$277K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$139K$277K$277K$277K$277K$277K$277K
Cumulative$0$6.2M$12.4M$18.5M$22.8M$22.8M$22.8M$22.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.6x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$89.0M$89.0M20.6%
Year 1$91.7M+$15.2M$106.9M24.7%
Year 2$94.5M+$22.8M$117.2M27.1%
Year 3$97.3M+$22.8M$120.1M27.7%
Year 4$100.2M+$22.8M$123.0M28.4%
Year 5$103.2M+$22.8M$126.0M29.1%
$890.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.39B
Exit EV (11x)
$495.6M
Value Created
$126.0M
Exit EBITDA
$141.8M
Organic Growth
$227.8M
RCM Value Creation
$126.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.3M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.4M$8.6M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$139K$208K$277K$333K
Total$11.4M$17.1M$22.8M$27.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 99 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.6%-17.7%-7.5%2.3%
P97
Net-to-Gross14.8%16.6%22.6%30.6%
P15
Occupancy78.5%49.0%60.3%76.9%
P79
Rev/Bed$2.2M$616K$1.2M$1.6M
P89
Exp/Bed$1.8M$612K$1.2M$1.7M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML