Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OSS ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OSS ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL
CCN 390325 | PA | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.5M → Pro Forma $403K (+$7.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$149.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$403K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$7.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.3M (vs $7.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$96K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.0M$3.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$82K$3.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$458K$1.4M$1.8M$5.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$96K$96K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$747K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$740K$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$606K$1.2M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$48K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K$96K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-156.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
162.9x
Headroom (turns)
2506%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2506% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -156.4x, adding 255.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.5M$-7.5M-5.0%
Year 1$-7.7M+$5.2M$-2.4M-1.6%
Year 2$-7.9M+$7.9M$-51K-0.0%
Year 3$-8.1M+$7.9M$-288K-0.2%
Year 4$-8.4M+$7.9M$-532K-0.4%
Year 5$-8.6M+$7.9M$-784K-0.5%
$-74.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-8.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$65.9M
Value Created
$-784K
Exit EBITDA
$-11.9M
Organic Growth
$78.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-784K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.5M
A/R Days Reduction$909K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$48K$72K$96K$115K
Total$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.0%-16.0%-0.4%8.4%
P39
Net-to-Gross31.2%24.3%31.7%43.5%
P48
Occupancy20.8%21.5%40.3%60.7%
P23
Rev/Bed$5.0M$415K$1.1M$1.9M
P99
Exp/Bed$5.2M$452K$1.1M$1.8M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML