Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PHYSICIANS CARE SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PHYSICIANS CARE SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 390324 | PA | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $6.7M → Pro Forma $8.8M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$744K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$798K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$790K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$486K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$798K$798K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$768K$22K$790K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$122K$363K$486K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$200K$399K$599K$798K$798K$798K$798K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$198K$395K$593K$790K$790K$790K$790K
A/R Days Reduction$0$162K$324K$486K$486K$486K$486K$486K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$572K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.7M$6.7M16.7%
Year 1$6.9M+$1.4M$8.3M20.7%
Year 2$7.1M+$2.1M$9.2M23.0%
Year 3$7.3M+$2.1M$9.4M23.5%
Year 4$7.5M+$2.1M$9.6M24.1%
Year 5$7.7M+$2.1M$9.8M24.6%
$66.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$108.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$41.5M
Value Created
$9.8M
Exit EBITDA
$10.6M
Organic Growth
$21.0M
RCM Value Creation
$9.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$399K$599K$798K$958K
Denial Rate Reductio$395K$593K$790K$949K
A/R Days Reduction$243K$364K$486K$583K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.7%-25.1%-8.7%13.7%
P78
Net-to-Gross25.6%25.7%28.0%36.1%
P22
Occupancy21.1%11.8%19.7%31.1%
P50
Rev/Bed$3.3M$972K$1.4M$2.7M
P78
Exp/Bed$2.8M$1.2M$1.4M$2.8M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML