Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GEISINGER WYOMING VALLEY MED CTR 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GEISINGER WYOMING VALLEY MED CTR
CCN 390270 | PA | 309 beds | Current EBITDA $46.6M → Pro Forma $87.7M (+$41.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$782.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$46.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$41.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$87.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$30.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$41.2M
Modeled Uplift
$30.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $30.4M (vs $41.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$501K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$41.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.7M$15.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.1M$430K$15.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.1M$9.5M$30.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$501K$501K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.9M$7.8M$11.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.9M$7.7M$11.6M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M$15.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$250K$501K$501K$501K$501K$501K$501K
Cumulative$0$11.2M$22.4M$33.4M$41.2M$41.2M$41.2M$41.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $41.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x
9.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
10.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
11.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
12.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
31%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 31% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$46.6M$46.6M5.9%
Year 1$48.0M+$27.5M$75.4M9.6%
Year 2$49.4M+$41.2M$90.6M11.6%
Year 3$50.9M+$41.2M$92.1M11.8%
Year 4$52.4M+$41.2M$93.6M12.0%
Year 5$54.0M+$41.2M$95.2M12.2%
$465.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.05B
Exit EV (11x)
$581.1M
Value Created
$95.2M
Exit EBITDA
$74.2M
Organic Growth
$411.8M
RCM Value Creation
$95.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.8M$11.7M$15.7M$18.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.7M$11.6M$15.5M$18.6M
A/R Days Reduction$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
Clean Claim Rate$250K$376K$501K$601K
Total$20.6M$30.9M$41.2M$49.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.9%-17.7%-7.5%-0.6%
P85
Net-to-Gross12.6%16.4%22.7%28.8%
P2
Occupancy80.9%55.5%68.7%78.2%
P80
Rev/Bed$2.5M$1.1M$1.4M$1.8M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.1M$1.5M$1.9M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML