Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FORBES REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FORBES REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 390267 | PA | 233 beds | Current EBITDA $-12.3M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$17.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$327.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-12.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$17.2M
Modeled Uplift
$12.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.2M (vs $17.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$210K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.5M$6.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.3M$180K$6.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.0M$4.0M$12.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$210K$210K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.9M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$105K$210K$210K$210K$210K$210K$210K
Cumulative$0$4.7M$9.4M$14.0M$17.2M$17.2M$17.2M$17.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-21.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
27.7x
Headroom (turns)
426%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 426% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -21.2x, adding 120.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-12.3M$-12.3M-3.8%
Year 1$-12.7M+$11.5M$-1.2M-0.4%
Year 2$-13.1M+$17.2M$4.2M1.3%
Year 3$-13.5M+$17.2M$3.8M1.2%
Year 4$-13.9M+$17.2M$3.4M1.0%
Year 5$-14.3M+$17.2M$2.9M0.9%
$-123.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$32.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$155.6M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-19.6M
Organic Growth
$172.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$105K$157K$210K$251K
Total$8.6M$12.9M$17.2M$20.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.8%-18.2%-8.7%-1.0%
P62
Net-to-Gross22.1%16.8%23.1%30.0%
P44
Occupancy72.0%52.9%61.8%76.7%
P68
Rev/Bed$1.4M$832K$1.2M$1.6M
P64
Exp/Bed$1.5M$821K$1.2M$1.7M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML