Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 390265 | PA | 289 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.8M → Pro Forma $7.8M (+$16.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$316.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$16.6M
Modeled Uplift
$10.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.8M (vs $16.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$202K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.3M$6.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$174K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$970K$2.9M$3.8M$12.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$202K$202K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$101K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K$202K
Cumulative$0$4.5M$9.1M$13.5M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M$16.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-9.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
16.1x
Headroom (turns)
247%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 247% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -9.6x, adding 108.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.8M$-8.8M-2.8%
Year 1$-9.1M+$11.1M$2.0M0.6%
Year 2$-9.4M+$16.6M$7.3M2.3%
Year 3$-9.6M+$16.6M$7.0M2.2%
Year 4$-9.9M+$16.6M$6.7M2.1%
Year 5$-10.2M+$16.6M$6.4M2.0%
$-88.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$70.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$158.7M
Value Created
$6.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.1M
Organic Growth
$166.4M
RCM Value Creation
$6.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.7M$6.3M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$101K$152K$202K$243K
Total$8.3M$12.5M$16.6M$20.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.8%-16.3%-7.0%-0.3%
P65
Net-to-Gross18.7%15.9%22.2%28.7%
P35
Occupancy47.7%54.9%66.2%77.5%
P12
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.3M$1.8M
P27
Exp/Bed$1.1M$989K$1.4M$1.8M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML