Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MILTON S. HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MILTON S. HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 390256 | PA | 616 beds | Current EBITDA $-57.1M → Pro Forma $52.1M (+$109.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.08B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-57.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$109.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$52.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$79.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$109.2M
Modeled Uplift
$78.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$30.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $78.3M (vs $109.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$41.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$41.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$25.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.3M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$109.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$41.5M$41.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$40.0M$1.1M$41.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6.4M$18.9M$25.3M$79.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$10.4M$20.8M$31.1M$41.5M$41.5M$41.5M$41.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$10.3M$20.6M$30.8M$41.1M$41.1M$41.1M$41.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$8.4M$16.8M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$664K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Cumulative$0$29.7M$59.5M$88.6M$109.2M$109.2M$109.2M$109.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $109.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-9.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
15.8x
Headroom (turns)
243%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 243% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -9.3x, adding 108.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-57.1M$-57.1M-2.8%
Year 1$-58.8M+$72.8M$14.0M0.7%
Year 2$-60.6M+$109.2M$48.6M2.3%
Year 3$-62.4M+$109.2M$46.8M2.3%
Year 4$-64.3M+$109.2M$44.9M2.2%
Year 5$-66.2M+$109.2M$43.0M2.1%
$-571.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$473.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.04B
Value Created
$43.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-91.0M
Organic Growth
$1.09B
RCM Value Creation
$43.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$20.8M$31.1M$41.5M$49.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$20.6M$30.8M$41.1M$49.3M
A/R Days Reduction$12.6M$18.9M$25.3M$30.3M
Clean Claim Rate$664K$996K$1.3M$1.6M
Total$54.6M$81.9M$109.2M$131.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 30 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.8%-20.2%-8.8%0.3%
P59
Net-to-Gross31.3%16.7%23.1%28.4%
P81
Occupancy81.7%70.5%75.5%79.5%
P80
Rev/Bed$3.4M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
P89
Exp/Bed$3.5M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML