Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL HOSPITAL OF SCRANTON 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REGIONAL HOSPITAL OF SCRANTON
CCN 390237 | PA | 220 beds | Current EBITDA $-38.8M → Pro Forma $-27.1M (+$11.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$221.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-38.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-27.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$11.6M
Modeled Uplift
$8.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.0M (vs $11.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$141K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.4M$4.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.3M$122K$4.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$678K$2.0M$2.7M$8.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$141K$141K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$897K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$71K$141K$141K$141K$141K$141K$141K
Cumulative$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.4M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M$11.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-38.8M$-38.8M-17.5%
Year 1$-39.9M+$7.8M$-32.2M-14.6%
Year 2$-41.1M+$11.6M$-29.5M-13.3%
Year 3$-42.4M+$11.6M$-30.7M-13.9%
Year 4$-43.6M+$11.6M$-32.0M-14.5%
Year 5$-44.9M+$11.6M$-33.3M-15.1%
$-387.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-366.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.3M
Value Created
$-33.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-61.7M
Organic Growth
$116.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-33.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$71K$106K$141K$170K
Total$5.8M$8.7M$11.6M$14.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 92 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.5%-18.9%-7.6%1.8%
P27
Net-to-Gross15.2%17.1%23.5%30.8%
P16
Occupancy62.4%50.4%61.0%76.7%
P52
Rev/Bed$1.0M$671K$1.2M$1.6M
P34
Exp/Bed$1.2M$650K$1.2M$1.7M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML