Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 390231 | PA | 588 beds | Current EBITDA $-149.1M → Pro Forma $-108.9M (+$40.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$763.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-149.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-108.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$40.1M
Modeled Uplift
$27.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.2M (vs $40.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$488K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.3M$15.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.7M$420K$15.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.9M$9.3M$29.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$488K$488K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$244K$488K$488K$488K$488K$488K$488K
Cumulative$0$10.9M$21.9M$32.5M$40.1M$40.1M$40.1M$40.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-149.1M$-149.1M-19.5%
Year 1$-153.5M+$26.8M$-126.8M-16.6%
Year 2$-158.1M+$40.1M$-118.0M-15.5%
Year 3$-162.9M+$40.1M$-122.7M-16.1%
Year 4$-167.8M+$40.1M$-127.6M-16.7%
Year 5$-172.8M+$40.1M$-132.7M-17.4%
$-1.49B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.46B
Exit EV (11x)
$31.3M
Value Created
$-132.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-237.4M
Organic Growth
$401.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-132.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.6M$11.4M$15.3M$18.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.6M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$11.1M
Clean Claim Rate$244K$366K$488K$586K
Total$20.1M$30.1M$40.1M$48.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-19.5%-19.6%-8.9%-0.7%
P27
Net-to-Gross28.3%15.9%21.8%28.4%
P70
Occupancy74.1%66.6%74.8%78.5%
P45
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
P13
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.6M$1.9M$2.6M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML