Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRICK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRICK HOSPITAL
CCN 390217 | PA | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $9.8M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$67.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$936K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$821K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$207K$614K$821K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$337K$674K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$334K$668K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$274K$547K$821K$821K$821K$821K$821K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$966K$1.9M$2.9M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x68% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M9.3%
Year 1$6.5M+$2.4M$8.8M13.1%
Year 2$6.6M+$3.5M$10.2M15.1%
Year 3$6.8M+$3.5M$10.4M15.4%
Year 4$7.0M+$3.5M$10.6M15.7%
Year 5$7.3M+$3.5M$10.8M16.0%
$62.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$118.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$56.3M
Value Created
$10.8M
Exit EBITDA
$10.0M
Organic Growth
$35.5M
RCM Value Creation
$10.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$674K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$668K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$410K$615K$821K$985K
Clean Claim Rate$22K$32K$43K$52K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.3%-15.4%-0.5%8.3%
P80
Net-to-Gross29.3%24.5%31.8%43.3%
P39
Occupancy74.6%23.5%40.4%61.9%
P86
Rev/Bed$2.0M$414K$889K$1.8M
P79
Exp/Bed$1.9M$443K$1.1M$1.5M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML