Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL
CCN 390203 | PA | 247 beds | Current EBITDA $-31.1M → Pro Forma $-14.5M (+$16.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$317.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-31.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-14.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$16.7M
Modeled Uplift
$11.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.3M (vs $16.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$203K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.3M$6.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.1M$174K$6.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$973K$2.9M$3.9M$12.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$203K$203K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$101K$203K$203K$203K$203K$203K$203K
Cumulative$0$4.5M$9.1M$13.5M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-31.1M$-31.1M-9.8%
Year 1$-32.1M+$11.1M$-20.9M-6.6%
Year 2$-33.0M+$16.7M$-16.3M-5.2%
Year 3$-34.0M+$16.7M$-17.3M-5.5%
Year 4$-35.0M+$16.7M$-18.4M-5.8%
Year 5$-36.1M+$16.7M$-19.4M-6.1%
$-311.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-213.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$97.8M
Value Created
$-19.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-49.6M
Organic Growth
$166.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-19.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$101K$152K$203K$244K
Total$8.3M$12.5M$16.7M$20.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.8%-18.2%-8.8%-2.1%
P45
Net-to-Gross21.9%16.6%22.4%29.6%
P45
Occupancy58.5%53.0%61.8%76.7%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.3M$859K$1.2M$1.6M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.4M$892K$1.3M$1.7M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML