Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — INDIANA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 390173 | PA | 134 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.0M → Pro Forma $4.0M (+$10.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$189.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$10.0M
Modeled Uplift
$6.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.6M (vs $10.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$121K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$104K$3.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$582K$1.7M$2.3M$7.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$121K$121K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$949K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$939K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$770K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$61K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K$121K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-12.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
19.3x
Headroom (turns)
297%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 297% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -12.8x, adding 111.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.0M$-6.0M-3.2%
Year 1$-6.2M+$6.7M$465K0.2%
Year 2$-6.4M+$10.0M$3.6M1.9%
Year 3$-6.6M+$10.0M$3.4M1.8%
Year 4$-6.8M+$10.0M$3.2M1.7%
Year 5$-7.0M+$10.0M$3.0M1.6%
$-60.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$93.3M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.6M
Organic Growth
$99.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$61K$91K$121K$146K
Total$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$12.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 108 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.2%-18.4%-6.5%5.2%
P55
Net-to-Gross29.6%17.8%25.5%34.5%
P63
Occupancy46.4%44.7%59.9%76.7%
P28
Rev/Bed$1.4M$497K$1.0M$1.5M
P73
Exp/Bed$1.5M$503K$1.1M$1.6M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML