Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UPMC - PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UPMC - PRESBYTERIAN SHADYSIDE
CCN 390164 | PA | 1141 beds | Current EBITDA $-514.9M → Pro Forma $-397.2M (+$117.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.24B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-514.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$117.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-397.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$85.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$117.6M
Modeled Uplift
$75.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$42.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $75.0M (vs $117.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$44.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$44.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$27.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.4M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$117.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$44.7M$44.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$43.0M$1.2M$44.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6.9M$20.3M$27.2M$85.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$11.2M$22.4M$33.5M$44.7M$44.7M$44.7M$44.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11.1M$22.1M$33.2M$44.3M$44.3M$44.3M$44.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$9.1M$18.1M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M$27.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$715K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Cumulative$0$32.0M$64.1M$95.4M$117.6M$117.6M$117.6M$117.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $117.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-514.9M$-514.9M-23.0%
Year 1$-530.3M+$78.4M$-451.9M-20.2%
Year 2$-546.2M+$117.6M$-428.6M-19.2%
Year 3$-562.6M+$117.6M$-445.0M-19.9%
Year 4$-579.5M+$117.6M$-461.9M-20.7%
Year 5$-596.9M+$117.6M$-479.3M-21.4%
$-5.15B
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.27B
Exit EV (11x)
$-123.1M
Value Created
$-479.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-820.1M
Organic Growth
$1.18B
RCM Value Creation
$-479.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$22.4M$33.5M$44.7M$53.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$22.1M$33.2M$44.3M$53.1M
A/R Days Reduction$13.6M$20.4M$27.2M$32.6M
Clean Claim Rate$715K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Total$58.8M$88.2M$117.6M$141.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 10 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.0%-22.2%-9.3%-2.6%
P20
Net-to-Gross12.7%17.8%27.9%31.4%
P0
Occupancy74.8%72.0%74.3%75.4%
P60
Rev/Bed$2.0M$2.2M$2.5M$3.3M
P10
Exp/Bed$2.4M$2.3M$2.6M$3.3M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML