Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE CHAMBERSBURG HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE CHAMBERSBURG HOSPITAL
CCN 390151 | PA | 234 beds | Current EBITDA $22.7M → Pro Forma $45.6M (+$22.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$435.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$45.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$22.9M
Modeled Uplift
$15.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.7M (vs $22.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$278K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.7M$8.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.4M$239K$8.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$4.0M$5.3M$16.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$278K$278K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$139K$278K$278K$278K$278K$278K$278K
Cumulative$0$6.2M$12.5M$18.6M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.4x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x78% / 17.9x
9.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.4x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.5x
10.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
11.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
12.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.7M$22.7M5.2%
Year 1$23.4M+$15.3M$38.6M8.9%
Year 2$24.1M+$22.9M$47.0M10.8%
Year 3$24.8M+$22.9M$47.7M11.0%
Year 4$25.5M+$22.9M$48.4M11.1%
Year 5$26.3M+$22.9M$49.2M11.3%
$227.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$541.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$314.2M
Value Created
$49.2M
Exit EBITDA
$36.2M
Organic Growth
$228.9M
RCM Value Creation
$49.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$139K$209K$278K$334K
Total$11.4M$17.2M$22.9M$27.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.2%-18.2%-8.7%-1.0%
P85
Net-to-Gross33.1%16.8%23.1%30.0%
P80
Occupancy59.9%52.9%61.8%76.7%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.9M$832K$1.2M$1.6M
P85
Exp/Bed$1.8M$821K$1.2M$1.7M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML