Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WESTMORELAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WESTMORELAND REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 390145 | PA | 283 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $20.5M (+$15.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$289.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$15.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.2M (vs $15.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$185K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$159K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$887K$2.6M$3.5M$11.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$185K$185K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.3M$12.3M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 26.2x97% / 29.5x101% / 32.8x103% / 34.4x105% / 36.1x
9.0x87% / 23.0x92% / 25.9x96% / 28.8x98% / 30.2x100% / 31.7x
10.0x83% / 20.3x87% / 23.0x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.2x
11.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.2x91% / 25.4x
12.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M1.8%
Year 1$5.4M+$10.1M$15.6M5.4%
Year 2$5.6M+$15.2M$20.8M7.2%
Year 3$5.8M+$15.2M$21.0M7.3%
Year 4$6.0M+$15.2M$21.2M7.3%
Year 5$6.1M+$15.2M$21.3M7.4%
$52.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$234.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$181.8M
Value Created
$21.3M
Exit EBITDA
$8.4M
Organic Growth
$152.0M
RCM Value Creation
$21.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$139K$185K$222K
Total$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 75 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.8%-16.0%-7.0%0.1%
P76
Net-to-Gross33.7%16.4%22.7%29.1%
P82
Occupancy62.8%54.9%66.2%78.0%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.0M$1.0M$1.3M$1.8M
P26
Exp/Bed$1.0M$947K$1.4M$1.8M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML