Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL
CCN 390139 | PA | 244 beds | Current EBITDA $-45.3M → Pro Forma $-24.4M (+$20.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$397.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-45.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-24.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$20.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.7M (vs $20.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$254K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.9M$7.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.6M$218K$7.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$254K$254K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$127K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K$254K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.4M$16.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M$20.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-45.3M$-45.3M-11.4%
Year 1$-46.7M+$13.9M$-32.7M-8.2%
Year 2$-48.1M+$20.9M$-27.2M-6.8%
Year 3$-49.5M+$20.9M$-28.6M-7.2%
Year 4$-51.0M+$20.9M$-30.1M-7.6%
Year 5$-52.5M+$20.9M$-31.6M-8.0%
$-453.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-348.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$105.1M
Value Created
$-31.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-72.2M
Organic Growth
$208.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-31.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.0M$6.0M$7.9M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$127K$191K$254K$305K
Total$10.4M$15.7M$20.9M$25.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.4%-18.2%-8.8%-2.1%
P40
Net-to-Gross21.4%16.6%22.4%29.6%
P42
Occupancy68.1%53.0%61.8%76.7%
P60
Rev/Bed$1.6M$859K$1.2M$1.6M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.8M$892K$1.3M$1.7M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML