Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UPMC BEDFORD 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UPMC BEDFORD
CCN 390117 | PA | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $863K → Pro Forma $3.5M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$49.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$863K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$956K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$998K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$988K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$607K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$998K$998K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$961K$27K$988K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$153K$454K$607K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$250K$499K$749K$998K$998K$998K$998K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$247K$494K$741K$988K$988K$988K$988K
A/R Days Reduction$0$202K$405K$607K$607K$607K$607K$607K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$715K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x94% / 27.5x99% / 30.9x103% / 34.3x105% / 36.0x107% / 37.7x
9.0x89% / 24.1x93% / 27.1x98% / 30.1x100% / 31.7x101% / 33.2x
10.0x84% / 21.3x89% / 24.1x93% / 26.8x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.5x
11.0x80% / 19.1x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x93% / 26.6x
12.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.4x
Headroom (turns)
68%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 68% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.1x, adding 6.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$863K$863K1.7%
Year 1$889K+$1.8M$2.6M5.3%
Year 2$915K+$2.6M$3.5M7.1%
Year 3$943K+$2.6M$3.6M7.1%
Year 4$971K+$2.6M$3.6M7.2%
Year 5$1.0M+$2.6M$3.6M7.3%
$8.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$39.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.3M
Value Created
$3.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$26.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$499K$749K$998K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$494K$741K$988K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$304K$455K$607K$729K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$38K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 78 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.7%-13.3%0.4%8.4%
P53
Net-to-Gross26.5%21.7%31.7%43.3%
P32
Occupancy30.4%26.2%43.4%63.3%
P31
Rev/Bed$1.4M$415K$849K$1.6M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.4M$407K$1.0M$1.5M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML