Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARIA HEALTH 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARIA HEALTH
CCN 390115 | PA | 457 beds | Current EBITDA $-59.1M → Pro Forma $-27.5M (+$31.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$600.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-59.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-27.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$31.6M
Modeled Uplift
$21.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $21.9M (vs $31.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$384K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.0M$12.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.6M$330K$11.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.8M$5.5M$7.3M$23.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$384K$384K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.0M$5.9M$8.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M$11.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.4M$4.9M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$192K$384K$384K$384K$384K$384K$384K
Cumulative$0$8.6M$17.2M$25.6M$31.6M$31.6M$31.6M$31.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-59.1M$-59.1M-9.8%
Year 1$-60.9M+$21.1M$-39.8M-6.6%
Year 2$-62.7M+$31.6M$-31.1M-5.2%
Year 3$-64.6M+$31.6M$-33.0M-5.5%
Year 4$-66.6M+$31.6M$-35.0M-5.8%
Year 5$-68.6M+$31.6M$-36.9M-6.2%
$-591.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-406.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$184.9M
Value Created
$-36.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-94.2M
Organic Growth
$316.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-36.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$14.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.9M$8.9M$11.9M$14.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Clean Claim Rate$192K$288K$384K$461K
Total$15.8M$23.7M$31.6M$37.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 49 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.8%-15.8%-3.8%1.8%
P31
Net-to-Gross26.3%17.1%24.4%30.0%
P60
Occupancy75.4%59.9%71.9%77.5%
P61
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.7M$2.3M
P27
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.4M$1.7M$2.2M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML