Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOSPITAL OF THE UNIV OF PENNA 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOSPITAL OF THE UNIV OF PENNA
CCN 390111 | PA | 1051 beds | Current EBITDA $-428.9M → Pro Forma $-252.0M (+$177.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.36B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-428.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$177.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-252.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$129.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$177.0M
Modeled Uplift
$117.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$59.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $117.7M (vs $177.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$67.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$66.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$40.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$2.2M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$177.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$67.3M$67.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$64.8M$1.9M$66.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$10.3M$30.6M$40.9M$129.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$16.8M$33.6M$50.5M$67.3M$67.3M$67.3M$67.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$16.7M$33.3M$50.0M$66.6M$66.6M$66.6M$66.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$13.6M$27.3M$40.9M$40.9M$40.9M$40.9M$40.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$1.1M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Cumulative$0$48.2M$96.4M$143.5M$177.0M$177.0M$177.0M$177.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $177.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-428.9M$-428.9M-12.8%
Year 1$-441.8M+$118.0M$-323.8M-9.6%
Year 2$-455.1M+$177.0M$-278.1M-8.3%
Year 3$-468.7M+$177.0M$-291.7M-8.7%
Year 4$-482.8M+$177.0M$-305.8M-9.1%
Year 5$-497.3M+$177.0M$-320.3M-9.5%
$-4.29B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.52B
Exit EV (11x)
$766.4M
Value Created
$-320.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-683.2M
Organic Growth
$1.77B
RCM Value Creation
$-320.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$33.6M$50.5M$67.3M$80.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$33.3M$50.0M$66.6M$79.9M
A/R Days Reduction$20.5M$30.7M$40.9M$49.1M
Clean Claim Rate$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Total$88.5M$132.7M$177.0M$212.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.8%-17.8%-2.7%4.7%
P29
Net-to-Gross17.3%20.5%28.4%31.4%
P14
Occupancy75.6%72.0%74.6%78.2%
P57
Rev/Bed$3.2M$2.1M$2.3M$3.1M
P71
Exp/Bed$3.6M$2.0M$2.5M$2.7M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML