Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 390110 | PA | 241 beds | Current EBITDA $-92.5M → Pro Forma $-69.6M (+$22.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$435.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-92.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-69.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$22.9M
Modeled Uplift
$16.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.4M (vs $22.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$278K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.7M$8.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.4M$239K$8.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$4.0M$5.3M$16.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$278K$278K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$139K$278K$278K$278K$278K$278K$278K
Cumulative$0$6.2M$12.5M$18.6M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M$22.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-92.5M$-92.5M-21.2%
Year 1$-95.2M+$15.3M$-80.0M-18.4%
Year 2$-98.1M+$22.9M$-75.2M-17.3%
Year 3$-101.0M+$22.9M$-78.1M-18.0%
Year 4$-104.1M+$22.9M$-81.2M-18.7%
Year 5$-107.2M+$22.9M$-84.3M-19.4%
$-924.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-927.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-2.6M
Value Created
$-84.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-147.3M
Organic Growth
$228.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-84.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$10.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$139K$209K$278K$334K
Total$11.4M$17.2M$22.9M$27.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-21.2%-18.2%-8.8%-2.1%
P17
Net-to-Gross30.0%16.6%22.4%29.6%
P75
Occupancy74.2%53.0%61.8%76.7%
P69
Rev/Bed$1.8M$859K$1.2M$1.6M
P83
Exp/Bed$2.2M$892K$1.3M$1.7M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML