Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UPMC PASSAVANT 2026-04-26 09:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UPMC PASSAVANT
CCN 390107 | PA | 354 beds | Current EBITDA $-91.4M → Pro Forma $-70.6M (+$20.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$394.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-91.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-70.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$20.8M
Modeled Uplift
$13.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.7M (vs $20.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$252K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.9M$7.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.6M$217K$7.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$252K$252K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$126K$252K$252K$252K$252K$252K$252K
Cumulative$0$5.7M$11.3M$16.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M$20.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-91.4M$-91.4M-23.2%
Year 1$-94.1M+$13.8M$-80.3M-20.4%
Year 2$-97.0M+$20.8M$-76.2M-19.3%
Year 3$-99.9M+$20.8M$-79.1M-20.1%
Year 4$-102.9M+$20.8M$-82.1M-20.8%
Year 5$-106.0M+$20.8M$-85.2M-21.6%
$-913.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-937.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-23.2M
Value Created
$-85.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-145.6M
Organic Growth
$207.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-85.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.9M$7.8M$9.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
Clean Claim Rate$126K$189K$252K$303K
Total$10.4M$15.6M$20.8M$24.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 64 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-23.2%-17.9%-7.6%-0.5%
P12
Net-to-Gross14.2%16.7%23.1%30.1%
P10
Occupancy56.2%56.3%68.7%77.4%
P23
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.2M$1.5M$2.0M
P22
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML