Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DELAWARE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DELAWARE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 390081 | PA | 145 beds | Current EBITDA $1.5M → Pro Forma $9.0M (+$7.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$143.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$7.6M
Modeled Uplift
$4.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.9M (vs $7.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$92K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$79K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$440K$1.3M$1.7M$5.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$92K$92K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$718K$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$710K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$582K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$46K$92K$92K$92K$92K$92K$92K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.1M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x112% / 42.6x117% / 47.7x121% / 52.8x123% / 55.3x125% / 57.9x
9.0x106% / 37.5x111% / 42.0x116% / 46.6x118% / 48.8x120% / 51.1x
10.0x102% / 33.4x106% / 37.5x111% / 41.6x113% / 43.6x115% / 45.6x
11.0x98% / 30.1x102% / 33.8x106% / 37.5x108% / 39.4x110% / 41.2x
12.0x94% / 27.3x98% / 30.7x103% / 34.1x105% / 35.8x106% / 37.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.1x
Headroom (turns)
79%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 79% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.4x, adding 7.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.5M$1.5M1.0%
Year 1$1.5M+$5.0M$6.6M4.6%
Year 2$1.6M+$7.6M$9.1M6.4%
Year 3$1.6M+$7.6M$9.2M6.4%
Year 4$1.7M+$7.6M$9.2M6.4%
Year 5$1.7M+$7.6M$9.3M6.5%
$14.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$101.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$87.1M
Value Created
$9.3M
Exit EBITDA
$2.4M
Organic Growth
$75.5M
RCM Value Creation
$9.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$873K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$46K$69K$92K$110K
Total$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 103 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.0%-19.0%-7.5%4.9%
P67
Net-to-Gross14.7%18.2%25.0%33.5%
P11
Occupancy44.3%45.0%59.3%75.0%
P23
Rev/Bed$990K$519K$1.0M$1.5M
P45
Exp/Bed$980K$547K$1.1M$1.6M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML