Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BERWICK HOSPITAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BERWICK HOSPITAL CENTER
CCN 390072 | PA | 76 beds | Current EBITDA $430K → Pro Forma $724K (+$294K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$430K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$294K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$724K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+547bps
Margin Improvement
$206K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

57%
Realization (C)
$294K
Modeled Uplift
$167K
Risk-Adjusted
-$127K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 57% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$112K
+208bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$108K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$65K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+18bp
Total EBITDA Impact$294K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$104K$8K$112K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$108K$108K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$16K$49K$65K$206K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$28K$56K$84K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Cost to Collect$0$27K$54K$81K$108K$108K$108K$108K
A/R Days Reduction$0$22K$44K$65K$65K$65K$65K$65K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$81K$163K$240K$294K$294K$294K$294K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $294K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$430K$430K8.0%
Year 1$443K+$196K$639K11.9%
Year 2$456K+$294K$751K14.0%
Year 3$470K+$294K$764K14.2%
Year 4$484K+$294K$778K14.5%
Year 5$499K+$294K$793K14.7%
$4.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.4M
Value Created
$793K
Exit EBITDA
$685K
Organic Growth
$2.9M
RCM Value Creation
$793K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$56K$84K$112K$134K
Cost to Collect$54K$81K$108K$129K
A/R Days Reduction$33K$49K$65K$79K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$147K$221K$294K$353K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-18.3%-2.3%8.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross18.4%18.5%28.2%37.6%
P24
Occupancy0.9%36.0%57.2%73.8%
P0
Rev/Bed$71K$415K$671K$1.2M
P2
Exp/Bed$173K$404K$823K$1.3M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML