Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLEARFIELD HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLEARFIELD HOSPITAL
CCN 390052 | PA | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $1.1M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$846K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$854K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$845K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$520K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$854K$854K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$822K$23K$845K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$131K$389K$520K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$213K$427K$640K$854K$854K$854K$854K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$211K$423K$634K$845K$845K$845K$845K
A/R Days Reduction$0$173K$346K$520K$520K$520K$520K$520K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$612K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-8.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
15.0x
Headroom (turns)
231%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 231% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -8.5x, adding 107.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-2.6%
Year 1$-1.2M+$1.5M$337K0.8%
Year 2$-1.2M+$2.2M$1.1M2.5%
Year 3$-1.2M+$2.2M$1.0M2.4%
Year 4$-1.3M+$2.2M$978K2.3%
Year 5$-1.3M+$2.2M$940K2.2%
$-11.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.6M
Value Created
$940K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.8M
Organic Growth
$22.5M
RCM Value Creation
$940K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$427K$640K$854K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$423K$634K$845K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$260K$390K$520K$623K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$20K$27K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.6%-12.5%1.7%9.0%
P41
Net-to-Gross30.6%21.7%31.7%44.0%
P44
Occupancy25.6%27.9%46.8%69.3%
P23
Rev/Bed$1.1M$414K$841K$1.8M
P54
Exp/Bed$1.1M$391K$963K$1.5M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML